adrianalimaismoreimportantthanyo wrote on (2010-08-03 12:42:04):

Sorry for the logical fallacy, but you must be retarded. Trust me, a lot of guys probably want to fuck her more now than they did back when she was skinnier, because she has even more of the "good stuff" now, but is still plenty thin. Take it from a bi girl; she looks even better than she did before, not worse. I know this is a matter of personal taste, but seriously, what doctor do you think this woman could talk to that would EVER be able to accurately tell her she needs to lose weight or doesn't look healthy? No, she's not as toned as she used to be, but until Twiggy, or at least until the "heroin chic" thing took over, a female not being perfectly toned and having a little extra something was a GOOD THING, and I personally think it is still a good thing. 30 years ago, fashion models were a size 8. The only reason designers have propagated this ideal of females being super thin, is because they want their models to be "walking hangers" as I once heard it put. The thinner you are, the better the clothes "hang" off of you, so as to showcase the clothing better. The designers don't care shit about the models, and the models aren't supposed to be important. Their jobs are to show the clothes off, and that's it. So, naturally, women, and most men, should NOT look the way fashion designers desire, unless their bodies are naturally just VERY thin. Women are supposed to have more body fat than men--open a biology book or one of those "Get To Know Your Body" books they show confused adolescents during puberty. Or look at a simple poll for christs sake. Most males like girls who are curvier, so what could it possible matter even if she's got a little "gut," as you so inaccurately put it? I mean, what exactly would you want a girl modeling BRAS to look like? A flat, emaciated, couture model with nothing to fill her bra cups? I don't exactly want women with no breasts due to an unhealthy frame modeling something that's supposed to support breasts. That would make no sense. It seems to me that those who consider this "fat" have just fallen prey to a very transparent, silly, cultural body ideal that won't even be desired in another couple of decades. Look around at the celebrities being dubbed as hot recently--Kim Kardashian, Scarlett Johansen, Christina Hendricks--women with hot, curvy bodies, as they should be. Because, as Philip DeFranco once said, men want to "do terrible, terrible things to all the squishy parts on her body".

Anonymous wrote on (2010-08-01 13:00:46):

She is not fat at all or chubby. When you bend over even if your a size 0 your going to get skin folding. A Victoria secret model should have some meat anyways. Having a very skinny model with her A cups squeezed to look like a C does not make me want to buy bras.

WoodDuHerNow wrote on (2010-07-27 07:28:46):

Are you kidding me? I've got to believe that most women, even those in the public eye, would love to look as incredible as Adriana does. With the onslaught of mom next door types who look like they ate the Michelin man, I can only wish more of them would look as hot as Adriana does after having a baby.

lilkunta wrote on (2010-07-27 06:10:00):

This " She looks like she has a goider under her chin and swallowed and air-hose. " makes no sense. DO you proofread. " Adriana also made her way into Forbes magazine as being one of the highest paid celebs in the world! " Wrong. Shenever was this. U have her confused with that uber annoying Gisele and Heidi. & u sure it was highest paid celeb not model?